Critical success factors of PM Essay Example

Basic achievement components of PM Essay Example Basic achievement components of PM Essay Basic achievement components of PM Essay The articles center Is constrained to the European Funded activities in Bulgaria and he Authors accept that recognizing the basic achievement components of venture the executives, essentially encourages administrators to equip the task center In request to accomplish the undertakings principle objective inside financial plan, asset and time. The article proposes chosen center components distinguished through observational investigation of task achievement factors directed by an example study of supervisors and specialists from applicable associations of activities upheld by European projects. As per Mantilla and Allan, the past examines on Identifying venture achievement factors are customary. This is on the grounds that the looks into barely center around the viability of task the executives devices utilized by venture chiefs. In spite of the fact that appropriate usage of these instruments could contribute for the accomplishment of venture objective, there are a wide scope of task achievement factors that can conceivably Influence the undertaking achievement. Veil and Allan(2012). Kerchief and Allan hypothesize that the achievement of a task relies upon the satisfaction of certain variables which they call basic. They demand the presence of central point that are essential for a task to achieve Its objective. The ideas In the theory sound clear as there are some generally acknowledged Independent factors that essentially impact (which can later be bolstered with scholastic discoveries in the region) the accomplishment of an activities expectation. The creators didnt talk about how the unlucky deficiencies of the given potential elements make a task fall. The speculation in this article Is likewise exact. It Is bolstered by down to earth proves that are found from 132 venture chiefs and undertaking colleagues. As to point there are a few constraints on the sorts of respondents which I raise later in the assessment area. The speculation is restricted both in geology and the sort of undertaking it manages. The article centers around ventures financed by Operational Programs of the European Commission in Bulgaria. With regards to the writing, Mantilla and liana have set up a writing on recognizing basic achievement variables of undertaking the board. The creators clarify the nonappearance of bound together treatment and meaning of the idea In the field however there Is a general concurrence on the hugeness of sarong out basic achievement factors In the act of task the executives. Kerchief and Allan (2012) give really solidified detail confirms on what is increasingly significant in venture the executives. Its everything about whether venture partners are affirmed by Its outcomes. This is a generally acknowledged standard however the issue on this respect Is, the creators didnt determine the kinds of venture as there are various sorts of activities with different scope of objectives. For example, as a rule terms, the goals of business ventures and a help venture are not comparable. The equivalent is consistent with their researchers like, Dry. Rash and Dry. Emulated (2014) It is difficult to produce all inclusive agenda for venture achievement measures reasonable for all undertakings. Achievement standards vary from task to extend contingent upon different quantities of issues like size, uniqueness ND intricacy what's more, customer fulfillment is difficult to quantify Paul and Derek (2008) distinct partners sense and measure accomplishment in various manners with in a solitary undertaking. Achievement is distinctive for various partners in a specific task. This is generally founded on their commitment and desire. Other writing bolsters are additionally talked about regarding the matter comparable to the presence of two significant gatherings of undertaking achievement factors which are expressed as vital and strategic. The vital gathering incorporates venture crucial, the board backing and task booking. The strategic perspective incorporates customer counseling, human asset determination and work force preparing. These variables influence venture accomplishment at various phases of the task life cycle. To distinguish the basic achievement variables of undertaking the board, the creators directed a review where 132 task supervisors and individuals from ventures have taken an interest. They were chosen as agents of activities subsidized by CUE (European Commission). The example of undertakings has been chosen by a strategy for purposive testing. The respondents have filled an examiner intended with the end goal of the examination. The examiner was isolated in to three primary sections, examiner for venture achievement estimation, for venture execution and for the significance of basic achievement factors. The principle focal point of the article was the discoveries under the basic achievement factors. The respondents were given 15 potential variables and they were approached to distinguish the most basic Success factors dependent on their degree of significance. The recorded potential achievement factors were Competence of the trough, Support from the office controlling POP, Clarity of task objective, Top administration support, Competence of venture colleagues, Motivation of Project colleagues, successful correspondence between venture stake more seasoned, nature of subcontractor administration, accuracy in archiving and accomplishing of undertaking data powerful coordination of undertaking exercises, consistence with the guidelines and methodology set up by the POP, Systematic command over the undertaking execution, access to hierarchical assets, SMART arranging, Competence and sufficient help from an undertaking expert According to the creators the above records were readied dependent on writing audit. Veil and Allan (2012). The conclusive outcomes of this examination show the accompanying five factors as the most basic achievement determinants: first Competence of undertaking supervisor; Over 80% respondents demonstrated this factor as c ritical. second Compliance with the standards and strategies; practically 80% of the respondents have assessed this factor as critical. third Competence of undertaking group 66. 7% of the respondents have recognized this as critical. What's more it this was distinguished as profoundly significant by 30 % of the members. fourth Quality of administrations gave by subcontractors 66. % of the delegates showed this as critical fifth Support of the top administration ; 64% of the respondents recognized this as critical. With regards to the propriety of the exploration procedure and got result, the investigation depended on single respondent, venture chiefs and specialists. The quantity of the respondents might be agent, however they are all from one side of the undertaking speaks to. Rather all obligation bearers that contribute for an undertaking achievement ought to have been incorporated. For example we cannot see partners sees, end clients (customer) interest, and not even implementer s Judgment. How might we measure a task accomplishment without watching and breaking down its effect on the end clients? The other noteworthy point is we have no clue about whether the undertaking supervisors are fruitful or not in the tasks they have executed up until this point yet they are as yet settling on choice on basic factors that make a venture effective. Here the fact of the matter is if on the off chance that they have neglected to accomplish the proposed objective of the task, how would we confide in their Judgment alone on what makes a venture fruitful? With regards to the rundown of the given potential components, they appear to be restricted. Veil and Allan, present the above rundown of achievement elements to be made dependent on writing survey; however they neglect to give rundown of sufficient sources to that There are additionally some different components that ought to have been viewed as, for example, contributors intrigue and venture condition (political and social). Timothy, Debbie and Chris (2014) feature the presence of sorted out and basic achievement factors contributors consider at each phase of the task stage. Supporters are requesting in all stages. This supporters conduct factors influence the undertaking emphatically or contrarily at arranging, executing, checking and shutting stage with different degrees relying upon supports intrigue. In their investigation on the upsides of best practices in venture the executives, Livid. L, MME. C and credit. N 2010) stresses receiving best practices as a principle factor that prompts fruitful undertaking the board. Through recognizing and best practices, we create universal methodology of work, better procedure quality and better observing and controlling and so on. Kerchief and Allan demonstrated the over five elements to be extremely basic for an undertaking to be effective, yet there is no demonstrate on how the nonappearance of these variables can bring about task disappointment. For example as indicated by Dry. Rash and Dry. Emends(2014) ,the disappointment of an administration may not continually realize inability to a venture and great undertaking the executives doesn't generally ensure total task achievement. It is conceivable to accomplish an effective venture in any event, when the board has fizzled and the other way around. In this audit I have talked about Mantillas and Laminas article on Critical achievement variables of a task. The article covers a few focuses on the current ways to deal with venture achievement.

Falstaffs Influence on Prince Hal in I Henry IV :: Henry IV Henry V Essays

Falstaff's Influence on Prince Hal in I Henry IV Â â â In Shakespearean accounts, there is consistently one person who impacts the significant character and impressively propels the plot.â In I Henry IV by William Shakespeare, Falstaff is such a character.â Sir John Falstaff is maybe the most mind boggling comic character ever invented.â He conveys an honorable nearness in the inner consciousness; and in him,â we perceive our inside adoration what's more, envy of the defiant double character that we as a whole furtively wish for. The multi-faceted Falstaff, in comic rebel against peace, in his job as father figure to Prince Hal, and at last, in his common capacity to perceive and adjust to any circumstance, rises as the most mind boggling and dumbfounding character in dramatization. Â Â â â â â Frequently, in writing, the sun speaks to sovereignty, or for this situation the lord, who endeavors to maintain law and order.â Rhetorically, the moon, represents shakiness, not just on the grounds that it doesn't continue as before size to one's eyes over the long haul, but since it rules the recurring pattern of the tides. In this way, as a knight guided by moonlight, Falstaff is a nonconformist against law also, order.â This end discovers support in his clever redundancies and sobriquets. Falstaff is constantly mindful that Hal will one day become lord, and when that occurs, burglars will be respected in England byâ Let[ting] us be extravagance Diana's foresters, courteous fellows of the shade, monions of the moon; and let[ting] men state we be men of acceptable government, being administered as the ocean may be, by our novle also, pure paramour the moon, under whose face we take (I, ii, 25-30). Falstaff's last excusal of peace comes full circle with a comic request to the ruler, encouraging him to have nothing to do with old dad trick the law?â Do not thou, when thou workmanship King, hang a hoodlum (I, ii, 62-63).â We see a comparative designation in the following demonstration, ask him to leave for good (II, iv, 301), in which Falstaff again upbraids duty, law, and order.â Despite his absence of care for request and obligation, the agitator lethargic in perusers cheers Falstaff's rebellion of the foundation of his defense.â Falstaff appears to engage the normal peruser, for he identifies with them, similarly as a twentieth-century American

LoE Project Rules Against Hersay Research Paper

LoE Project Rules Against Hersay - Research Paper Example It reaches inferences based on perception made by others. This standard is totally against the immediate proof made by the people for the situation engaged with the court. The standard nullifies the significance of the decision of the individual who is legitimately engaged with the occurrence detailed for asserting the rights in court. Rather, someone else presents the realities from his own perspective that can't be considered as valid in the majority of the cases (Graham, 1982). The definition made by scientists for Hearsay is that an out-of-court explanation that is utilized to demonstrate the decision inside the court. The word ‘out-of-court’ needs some clarification. It contains all the vital clarifications that are not legitimately part of the court procedures. These are either the perceptions of decisions of others. The standard of gossip may be utilized by people to give proof to spare or authorize discipline against the genuine proof. It might be utilized to control reality in the kindness of the intentions of the observer. He may tell the perception of some other individual in a glossed over manner that fills his own need or point. It might be utilized in those cases in which the Declarant is either inaccessible for introducing himself to the court or he isn't sufficiently sure to record his announcements before the jury. In typical cases, the reason for the observer is to give his announcements to help in comprehending the case under the promise. His announcements depend on the immediate proof finished up from his experience, study, or perception. The observer is legitimately associated with the case. If there should be an occurrence of Hearsay, the Declarant lies outside the court. His pledge doesn’t have any job in the procedures of the court. He just feeds his data to someone else who assumes the job of witness. The observer will introduce the data dependent on the input from Declarant. This criticism depends on the roundabout perception with respect to the

Compare and contrast the actions Essay Example For Students

Thoroughly analyze the activities Essay Thoroughly analyze the activities, attributes and language of Romeo and Juliet before they meet and toward the finish of the play, with specific reference to act 2 scene 2 and act 5 scene 3 In Romeo and Juliet there are two fundamental changes in character, most unquestionably until they met each other they were by all accounts very different than they are later on in the play. Before they met at the feast Romeo was in Love with Rosaline and he is crippled and discouraged and he used to feel frustrated about himself dismal hours appear to be so long in light of the fact that Rosaline didnt feel a similar route about him. Juliet was a fairly juvenile youngster and was under severe management of her folks, she was kept from the outside world, and didnt truly have quite a bit of an actual existence outside her home. She couldnt truly have an appropriate relationship since she was possibly to have a darling if her folks concurred with them or picked them for her. They certainly wouldnt have concurred with her to wed Romeo since he is a Montague and she was a Capulet. When Romeo and Juliet meet each other they share a poem with, and this truly gives indications of development. In act 2 scene 2, this is just a couple of hours after the meal we can see from Juliets proposition of marriage that she is happy to follow all through the world This shows how Juliet developed in about one night, subsequent to becoming hopelessly enamored with Romeo she currently feels substantially more free and now she can even observe her life in an alternate point of view, and perhaps separated from her family. Then again Romeo acknowledges he has discovered the lady he needs to do be with for a mind-blowing remainder and uses such language to show his affection for her there lies more danger in thine eye than twenty of their blades he would want to kick the bucket by 20 of the capulets swords as opposed to living without her adoration. Romeo uses such language to accentuate that she is commendable and blessed messenger like, two of the most attractive stars in all the paradise he is contrasting her eyes with the brilliant stars of the night, and he likewise utilizes other symbolism to communicate his assessment of her magnificence The splendor of her cheek would disgrace those stars her cheeks are much more splendid and more appealing than her eyes. Romeos has an unexpected difference in heart from Rosaline, he understands Juliet is the one from him and he was more infatuated with being enamored previously, yet now he is no longer love debilitated and he has changed and he loves her and accepts its not only a squash. In act 5 scene 3 Romeo has an unexpected difference in character when he meets with Paris, Paris acts forceful and loaded with disdain towards Romeo for murdering Tybalt and reprimands him for the self destruction of Juliet, however Romeo doesnt need to slaughter Paris all he needs his to pass on close to Juliet, put not another wrongdoing upon my head Romeo asks Paris not to battle. In Romeos passing discourse there is an all-encompassing difference in character from Romeo, He is sorry to Tybalt With that hand that slice thy youth in twain to separate this that was thine adversary he needs the man who murdered tybalt to bite the dust and that is himself so he is devoting part off his demise to tybalt. In Juliets a lot shorter and hurried passing discourse we discover that all juliet needs now she has seen Romeo dead is to slaughter herself o glad knife, this is thy sheath. This is a concise discourse by Juliet yet she thinks there is no point in living if Romeo isnt alive.

HEC Tops in Marketing Outside US Per Princeton Review

Reuters reports: HEC in France has been voted the top business school outside the USA for the teaching of marketing by over 19,000 business school students in the latest survey by The Princeton Review. The school was one of only two non-US schools to feature in the complete ranking, which also covered subjects such as general and global management, finance and accounting, and operations. The survey, which involves 296 schools around the world asked students how well they felt their school equipped them to succeed in each of the specified areas on a five point scale. In the marketing category HEC was ranked alongside such major US players as Harvard, Fuqua, Kellogg andBerkeley Haas. I am always educating myself about excellent programs in specific areas at schools that are not in the top 10 or the M7 or H/S/W whatever title you want to give the elite programs. Why? Because not everyone will get accepted to the elite. However, attending an excellent program in your specific field of interest is usually the next best option. The Princeton Review survey is not proof that HEC provides an outstanding marketing program. However, if you are unlikely to get into Harvard, Kellogg, et.al., want a one-year program with an international experience, or simply prefer to remain in Europe for your marketing studies, the results of this survey and others like it should motivate you to research HEC and discover what it offers. The reasons for the survey results are far more interesting than the results themselves. In corresponding with Matt Symonds, seasoned observer of the MBA scene and co-author of Getting the MBA Admissions Edge, he reminded me that HEC is One of the Grandes Ecoles, the Ivy League of French education. The marketing faculty includesJean-Nol Kapferer, world expert on brands, Frdric Dalsace, author of the Harry Potter marketing strategy, and Wolfgang Ulaga, co-author of HBRs How to sell services more profitably. The Financial Times ranked HEC #1 among European Business schools for the last 3 years in a row. Uncover the reasons behind the rankings and discover the hidden gems in MBA education. One of them may be a perfect fit for you.

Philosophy Tutor Outlining Your Objection

Opus shows us how important it is to state your objections clearly. Greetings again, fellow philosophy students! It is summer again in Boston, a great time and place for philosophy tutoring! In my current series, I have been discussing how to utilize the essential tool of creating an outline for your philosophy papers. In my first two installments, I focused on outlining these important parts of your papers: introducing the main thesis and argumentative move, setting the stage for your thesis and argument through literature review and clarificatory work, and the main argumentative work. This time I will review outlining sections that consider and respond to objections and then conclude the paper. Recall from my last post how much I recommend things like diagramming as part of the outlining process. Diagramming the steps of your main argument goes a long way in helping you write the best paper you can. Something very similar holds for outlining your section on objections and replies. I suggest you begin by straight out numbering each objection you can think of. Include any and all that come to mind. Summarize each in one to three complete sentences. At the end of this process, you should have a nice numbered list that might range anywhere from one to a dozen objections. Next, before you begin to construct replies to the objections, start to think about the objections at a more general level by categorizing and comparing them. Which ones are from the literature on the topic and which ones did you think up on your own? Are any similar enough to each other that they might be considered variants of the same type? What might be underlying motivations for the different objections, and can different ones be grouped according to similar such motivations? Which are the more serious one, and which are less so? Do some directly contradict your main thesis or argumentative move and do others raise worries about indirect implications of them? Once you’ve raised these questions about your list of objections, you can organize them in a table classifying each according to where they fall in your answers to the questions. The above exercise will help you more clearly present the objections in your paper. In addition, classifying and categorizing your list of objections will help you more effectively and efficiently construct your responses. You may discover that one type of response will suffice for a few different objections that are of the same type. You may discover that addressing an underlying motivation for a few different objections can help stifle the tendency to generate more. You will figure out which ones require careful, extended reply and which ones can be more easily brushed off or even ignored for the purposes of your paper. Anyway you ultimately look at it, however, imposing order on the objections to be addressed in your paper will in turn allow you to develop your responses in an orderly way. Once you’ve got your chart (or diagram, etc.) organizing your objections and have begun formulating your replies, you should add short summaries of your replies to the chart (or diagram, etc.). You may find that the most serious objections to your main thesis and line of argument may themselves need to be formulated in terms of an argument, and that your developing response needs to be as well. In that case, you should reiterate the process I discussed in my last post for outlining arguments. Other objections may require less involved response. For example, you may come to the point where your case has become so strong (through your initial argument and responses to the more serious objections) that certain sorts of objections begin to appear, perhaps not completely impotent, but also in need of more argumentative motivation than it is your responsibility to give in the paper. At this point you may decide to make the â€Å"shifting the burden of proof† move against certain sorts of objections. This happens when you feel that you cannot give a straightforward refutation of the objection, but also think that the onus is now clearly and squarely on someone who wishes to wield the objection to come up with a good argument that it needs to be taken more seriously. Finally, the outlining process should conclude in you sketching a conclusion. It need not be a polished one, but you should make an attempt, once you’ve outlined the rest of the paper, to write a summary of what you think you’ve accomplished, or what you aim to have accomplished by means of the outline. This will help you determine whether you are satisfied with where you have gotten so far with with outline. If you are satisfied with your conclusion-sketch and think your outline has what it takes to get you there, then you are ready to really write the paper in its polished form. If not, go back and reiterate your outlining process. In either case, appreciate the power of the outlining process to enable you to write your very best essay!

Analysis Of The Book Alice Adventures - 1055 Words

AP Book Report 1. Alice Adventures in Wonderland 2. Lewis Carroll was the author of Alice Adventures in Wonderland. Written in 1862- 1863 during a journey with Reverent Robinson Duckworth and his three young daughters. 3. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson better known as his pen name, Lewis Carroll, was an English author was born January 27, 1832. He was a writer, mathematician, logician, Anglican cleric, and artist. 4. Characters: Major: Alice: Alice is a seven-year-old girl who stumbles upon the Wonderland after following a white rabbit. She comes from a family in Victorian England. When she stumbles upon Wonderland, she is frustrated with all the surroundings it has on her. - Curious: Once she sees the rabbit her curious nature sparks to follow it. - Emotional: When she didn’t know what to do she would start crying, The Mouse: The first creature Alice meets in Wonderland. Mouse is initially scared of Alice, when she talks about her cat. He later on takes her with him with other creatures. - Frightened: The mouse is frightened of Alice and the way she would talk about her pet cat Dinah. - Leader: When with the animal it seemed he was the only one with the authoritative figure. By the why he talked to them and such. The Queen of Hearts: Ruler of Wonderland. The Queen is very dominating towards everyone, and if they don’t follow her command the only solution she has is beheading everyone. - Impulsive: When things wouldn’t go the way she’d like she automatically sends someone toShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Book Alice s Adventures 1773 Words   |  8 Pagesâ€Å"Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland†, a famous English storybook written by Lewis Carroll in 1865. Burton’s adaptation of Carroll’s original tale takes quite a few liberties in order to make a more connected message of growth and renewal he believed was needed in order to enhance the story of Alice. The character Alice extracted from such classic tale and the alike lends herself to an interesting discussion relating to feminism and contemporary ideology. It can be said that Lewis Carroll’s â€Å"Alice AdventuresRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Alice s Adventures 824 Words   |  4 Pagesmost are familiar with the story of Alice in Wonderland. Admittedly, most are more familiar with the Disney movie, than the actual book. The movie and book are captivating in the ir imagination, and bare some striking similarities. The movie and the book have many differences. The movie has a different medium and can convey differently than the book. In 1951, Disney, a company well-known for animating favorite fairy tales, animated the well-loved story of Alice who fell down the rabbit hole and intoRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Alice s Adventures 1293 Words   |  6 PagesAlice’s Adventures in Wonderland is a novel by Charles Dodgson, better known under the pseudonym of Lewis Carroll to his readers. Published in 1865, the novel centers around a young girl’s lively adventures in a fantastical dream world. She falls into this world after she sees a rabbit with a pocket watch and waistcoat running through her yard and then follows him down a rabbit hole. Although marketed as a children’s story, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland has remained a mainstay with childrenRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Alice s Adventures 1882 Words   |  8 Pages Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland outline Introduction In the year 1865, Lewis. C. Carroll published a Novel titled, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. This novel tells the story of a girl named Alice who enters a bizarre world called Wonderland, which she initially cannot comprehend because she lacks knowledge of this world and her place in it, Thus, Alice takes a journey through this world to understand both it and herself. SomeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Alice s Adventures Essay2076 Words   |  9 PagesAlice’s Adventures AnnaMarie Bethune Northeast Alabama Community College  Enraged from the recent conversation with her aunt and uncle, Alice storms out the door. Headed to her usual spot beneath the old Willow near the edge of the forest, she runs full speed down the hill, hopefully relieving some of her anger. As she stops at the edge of the forest, book in hand, now sitting, she can’t help but notice her veins flooding with adrenaline. She’s so mad she can’t sit still. Alice jumps upRead MoreLewis Carrolls Alice in Wonderland: The Inevitable Loss of Childhood Innocence1478 Words   |  6 PagesThe novel enwraps with â€Å"Alice and her sister sitting on the bank of a river. Unquestionably bored, she is reading a book over her sister’s shoulder. Suddenly, she spots a small white rabbit in a pea coat, dart across the grass. What astounds her is that the rabbit takes out a small watch from its pocket and exclaims, I will be late. Alice had never heard a rabbit talk and moreover felt that it was bizarre for a rabbit to own a pocket watch. Curiosity takes Alice down the rabbit hole and this leadsRead MoreCurious Appetites : Food, Desire, Gender, And Subjectivity938 Words   |  4 Pages In the article â€Å"Curious Appetites: Food, Desire, Gender, and Subjectivity in Lewis Carroll’s Alice Texts,† Carina Garland takes on a classic childhood book and author. She enlightens the reader on the gender aspects behind the Lewis Carroll b ooks Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. Garland utilizes the knowledge of Carroll’s peculiar and slightly grotesque history of relationships with prepubescent girls and abhorrence of women, linked withRead MoreSymbolism And Origin Is The Cheshire Cat702 Words   |  3 Pageshad an odd sense of a personality, but spoke to Alice using wise words and thoughts. â€Å"It is not 100% clear why Carroll named this character ‘Cheshire Cat’. â€Å"To grin like a Cheshire Cat† was a common phrase in Carroll’s day. Its origin is unknown, but it may have originated from a sign painter in Cheshire, who painted grinning lions on the sign-boards of inns in the area† (Analysis). Even though the Cheshire Cat seemed crazy or â€Å"mad† he did give Alice a dose of reality in Wonderland. He said thingsRead MoreAlice in Wonderland: A Curious Child1443 Words   |  6 PagesAlice In Wonderland a nd a Curious Child Lewis Carrolls classic Alice in Wonderland has entertained not only children but adults for over one hundred years. The tale has become a treasure of philosophers, literary critics, and psychoanalysts. There appears to be something in Alice for everyone, and there are almost as many explanations of the work as there are commentators. One commentary is A Curious Child by Nina Auerbach. Auerbach discussed how Alice is a representation of a middle class childRead MoreTough Alice1309 Words   |  6 Pages ‘Tough Alice’ Extended Analysis Twelve Impossible Things Before Breakfast, is a collection of stories that vary from parodies to extended variations of famous fantasy stories. Jane Yolen, challenged the most popular children’s story ever, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll and created a more upbeat Wonderland with a more hard-hitting Alice than usual. The original Alice in Wonderland is a tale about a girl who falls asleep and dreams about this magical and adventurous land known as Wonderland